A spinosaur salt gland may sit above the eye. Why plausible?
Show answer & explanation
Answer: Short eye-nose route
Short eye-nose route ✓ — Short eye-nose route fits the proposed anatomy. The spinosaurid paper argues that facial changes shortened the distance between orbit and nostril, making a supraorbital gland with a duct route plausible. The counterintuitive point is that, under this interpretation, face shape can constrain plumbing.
New teeth growing in — New teeth growing in is a real dinosaur skull issue, but it does not explain a salt gland above the orbit. Teeth tell feeding and growth stories; a salt gland needs a secretion path. Being in the same head does not make the two systems solve the same problem.
Stronger neck muscles — Stronger neck muscles point behind the skull problem. Muscle power can explain posture or movement, but a salt gland needs space and an exit route for fluid. The surprising constraint here is facial architecture, not pulling strength.
More Paleontology questions
- After K-Pg, some plankton populations crashed without bouncing back. Why can a species go extinct even with some survivors still alive?
- After K-Pg impact darkness, what did ocean recovery lean on before normal food webs?
- Why might larger diatoms outlive smaller chalky nannoplankton in K-Pg seas?
- K-Pg shelled plankton died off in days. Why does darkness explain it better than acid dissolving shells?
- Why could tropical plankton lose more than polar plankton after global impact darkness?
- In asteroid darkness, why did some algae survive by becoming less plant-like?
